Avatar

#11 Hummer Drivers To Be Taxed For CO2 and Douchebaggery Emissions

hummer
Over the past decade, many Americans have grown fond of owning the most obnoxiously huge car possible. At first this meant a large SUV, now it means a Hummer, and pretty soon it will mean a full-fledged US army tank that can transform into Optimus Prime. Astonishingly, American men who drive Hummers have yet to realize that their weiners have stayed the same size and the hair on their back has only grown thicker. The women Hummer drivers, meanwhile, have caused several thousand accidents in recent years, but were too busy saying stupid things on their cell phones to even notice.

Additionally, despite a growing awareness of global warming and the harm of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, Hummers are still selling like crazy. Hummer drivers are consuming inordinate amounts of gasoline, making America more dependent on foreign sources of oil, and contributing to the never-ending gang-rape of our own natural resources. Of course, America cannot ban Hummers entirely because we are a free country and many Hummer drivers are “patriotic” donors to our country’s most influential lobbyists. However, in order to curb our country’s Hummer buying mania, America needs to tax Hummer drivers for both their CO2 and douchebaggery emissions.

While the tax for CO2 emissions is relatively self-explainable, the latter warrants some additional discussion. Basically, when Americans drive around in their obnoxiously huge Hummers, they are not only emitting lots of carbon dioxide into the air, but high levels of douchebaggery. These high levels are dangerous for two reasons: first, they can piss fellow off Americans and instigate episodes of scattered and varied violence - such as road rage, the thrashing of tires, and someone taking a dump on your windshield while you’re shopping inside Whole Foods. Secondly, these high levels are sometimes contagious, and can potentially cause other Americans to “douche-up,” gel their hair, and drop 60k for a yellow Hummer of their own.

Although the tax for CO2 emissions can be easily regulated (a flat fee for owning a Hummer, for example), the tax for douchebaggery emissions is a little more tricky. After all, not every Hummer driver is equally annoying. Therefore, the tax will have be based on the Carson Daily Scale of Douchebaggery (CCSD): the more similar the driver is to Carson Daily, the more he/she is a douchebag, and in turn, the more tax will be levied. The CCSD has undergone diligent scientific testing over the years, and has less than a 1% margin of error.

At this stage, Hummers have become an ingrained component of American culture, and it’s not likely that a new tax will cause Hummers to disappear overnight. Moreover, we probably wouldn’t know for several years, perhaps a decade or so, whether the tax was truly effective. However, if at some point in the future Americans can walk outside their homes, take a breath of air, and not cough from the high levels of CO2 and douchebaggery, then the tax will have indeed served its purpose. Until that day arrives, all Americans can do is pray - and when possible, take dumps on the windshields of Hummers.

backlink

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

#2 An Eco-Friendly Car That Doesn’t Look Like a Deformed Weiner

I don’t think any American in their right mind would deny either the economic or environmental benefits of owning an eco-friendly car. From day one, you consume less gasoline, which means you don’t have to spend as much moolah at the pump, and you don’t emit as many pollutants into the beautiful air. Seems like a real win-win situation, if it wasn’t for one remaining factor: eco-friendly cars, with only a handful of extremely over-priced exceptions, look like deformed weiners.

Even if you have absolutely nothing wrong with weiners, or even deformed weiners for that matter, you probably still don’t want to drive around in anything that even vaguely resembles the male genitalia. Granted, Americans are often too pre-occupied with superficial things, like clothing and accessories. We believe these superficial things reflect upon ourselves: unattractive people wear unattractive clothes, for example. I admit that this sort of thinking is usually completely ridiculous, but not always - when you drive around in a phallic-shaped vehicle, I’m sorry to break the news, you kinda look like a dick.

I am by no means a scientist, but I don’t understand why car manufacturers are so insistent on making eco-friendly cars that are so abnormally weird and ugly-looking. Sure, you can spend an arm and a leg to get an eco-friendly car that doesn’t look like a weiner, or you could purchase a regular car with moderate eco-friendly upgrades, but should these really be the alternatives? Can’t we have cars that are good for the environment and good for picking up chicks and/or dudes? Hell, I’d settle for an eco-friendly car that was good for picking up ugly chicks and/or dudes. Do you really need to drive a Hummer just to get one?

A lot of government money is currently going into alternative energy, and new eco-friendly car models are coming out all the time. I just hope that some of these models look a little bit less like the male genitalia, and a little more like… well, like anything else. Sure, America wants to save the environment, but what’s the point if we’re all going to look like dicks?

backlink

,

Ad Spot

ADS